Yury Selivanov added the comment: > If you really need network logging you should be able to configure a handler > that puts things in a queue whose other end is serviced by an asyncio task. > There should be no need to mess with the type of the logger object.
It's something that is easy to misconfigure. Having [logger+queue+logging thread] combination mitigates the risk a bit, but yeah, at the cost of increased complexity... > Anyway, in 3.4 it is what it is. :-) Right. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20847> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
