New submission from Michael Foord:
What steps will reproduce the problem?
>>> foo = Mock(name='foo')
>>> prop = PropertyMock(name='prop')
>>> type(foo).prop = prop
>>> foo.attach_mock(prop, 'prop')
>>> foo.mock_calls
[call.prop(<PropertyMock name='foo.prop' id='4300017296'>)]
Expected:
>>> foo.mock_calls
[]
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
% pip freeze | grep mock
mock==1.0.1
OS X 10.8.4
Please provide any additional information below.
It would be even cooler if attaching a property mock made calls to the
property appear in the mock_calls for the hosting mock without having to attach
it, the way it does with a non-property method :)
I use mock every day now and am firmly of the opinion it is far, far more
awesome than sliced bread. Thanks for making it available to the Python
community :)
----------
assignee: michael.foord
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 216488
nosy: kushal.das, michael.foord
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: Attaching a PropertyMock records calls
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21255>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
