Andreas van Cranenburgh added the comment: Here's a patch. I have added initializer and initargs keywords to both ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor, with the same semantics as multiprocessing.Pool.
I couldn't figure out what to do if the initializer fails with a ProcessPoolExecutor: how to properly send the traceback back? I also haven't gotten around to figure out how to write tests. I haven't added unitializers, don't know if they would be useful. ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35179/pool_initializer.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21423> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
