Antony Lee added the comment:
I have the patch almost ready, but ran into another issue: should
"path.with_name('foo/')" be allowed? It may make sense to treat it like
"path.with_name('foo')", just like 'Path("foo/") == Path("foo")'.
The implementation is also simpler with it, as it can reuse the "parse_parts"
approach used by "with_suffix". But this also raises a separate issue, which
is that with the current implementation, we have
"Path('foo').with_suffix('.bar') == Path('foo').with_suffix('.bar/')", and that
is less reasonable. Should I open a separate issue for that?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21714>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
