R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks Caelyn. This patch also needs a doc patch and a whatsnew entry in order to be complete. It's not obvious to me where the relevant documentation is, though, so perhaps we instead have missing documentation that should be addressed in a separate issue. The whatsnew entry would still be needed, though.
However, I think there is something important missing here in the patch itself. It is specified (section 4.2.7 Inclusion Loops) that it is a fatal error for an already included document to be specified in a recursively processed xinclude directive, and indeed failing to detect such a loop has DOS implications. So, the patch needs to address that before it can be committed. ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20928> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
