Michael Foord added the comment: I haven't reviewed the patch in detail, but I've had a scan through and it looks *great*. A quick and dirty check that it's "correct" is to compare the number of tests run before and after the patch - and if the numbers differ verifying that it's for good reasons (i.e. only *extra* tests being run and none being skipped / missed).
If that's the case I'd be strongly in favour of applying. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21741> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
