Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment:

On 20.06.2014 09:26, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 
> 2.7.8 will likely be earlier than expected in order to address the latest 
> OpenSSL update for the Windows installers. So while the likely time frame for 
> this hasn't changed (i.e. November'ish 2014), that release is now expected to 
> be 2.7.9 (assuming the OpenSSL review doesn't find any more surprises, which 
> is a big assumption).

I think we need to be more careful about using those patch level release
numbers. If we do a new release every time OpenSSL needs to get patched,
we'd probably hit the 2.7.10 wall later this year.

IMO, now would be a good time to discuss how we should deal with
the patch level number turning two digit or preventing that
using some other approach.

----------
nosy: +lemburg

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21308>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to