STINNER Victor added the comment: I read asyncore.patch: it is close to the selectors module, so it means duplicated efforts. I prefer to close this issuse since asyncore has been deprecated in favor of asyncio (and selectors).
Using the selectors module in asyncore would not be efficient because asyncore design requires to build a new selector for each poll, which is not efficient. asyncio only creates the selector once, and then use register/unregister. It's more efficient and scalable. ---------- resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6692> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
