Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment:
The patch would have to be updated to 3.5 (part of it no longer applies), but
other than that I think it's fine.
It may make sense to readd the comment for .getstate() to keep the state as
simple as possible ("The implementation should make sure that ``0`` is the most
common state."), but without requiring a specific number, type, etc.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12808>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
