Guido van Rossum added the comment:
OK, I'm convinced. Sorry Victor.
On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
>
> See for example test_generators, test_genexps, test_xml_etree or
> ctypes.test.test_objects.
>
> >>> dict(a = (i for i in xrange(10))) #doctest: +ELLIPSIS
> {'a': <generator object <genexpr> at ...>}
>
> >>> repr(element) # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
> "<Element 't\\xe4g' at 0x...>"
>
> But unit tests can be broken too. When I enhanced reprs this week
> (issue22031,
> issue22032), I needed to correct failed tests. Due to this facts I applied
> patches only to 3.5.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org <javascript:;>>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22081>
> _______________________________________
>
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22081>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
