R. David Murray added the comment: This seems like a good idea, based on the use case presented in the stackoverflow question.
This would be an enhancement, so it can only go in 3.5. Please submit a patch without the pep 8 changes, so we can easily see what the patch is actually changing. As far as the API goes, since the controls are passed to subprocess, might it be a good idea to make the API for these keywords the same as the one subprocess uses? ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22277> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
