Ethan Furman added the comment:
+ Special value which should be returned by the special methods
+ (:meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, etc.) to indicate
+ that the operation is not implemented with respect to the other type.
After a discussion on python-dev, I think this wording could be even clearer.
How about:
Special value which should be returned by the binary special methods
(e.g. :meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, :meth:`__rsub__`,
etc.) to indicate that the operation is not implemented with respect to
the other type; may be returned by the in-place binary special methods
(e.g. :meth:`__imul__`, :meth:`__iand__`, etc.) for the same purpose.
----------
status: closed -> open
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22780>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
