Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I agree that the patch is not acceptable as is. The public attribute *defaultdict* should be explicitly documented as it is now, so that it is indexed. On the other hand, users should not directly call .__missing__, and it is not normal to document the private special method implementation of classes. For example, a collections.Counter returns 0 for missing keys but the doc makes no mention of .__missing__ as the implementation. It simply describe how a counter works.
John is correct that people writing other subclasses with __missing__ should usually subclass dict. This might be clearer if that special method were properly documented and indexed. I opened #23006 for this. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy resolution: not a bug -> stage: resolved -> needs patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9536> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
