mdcb added the comment: I'm fine my patch doesn't resolve the "nanosecond support", but that doesn't mean the issue is closed per say.
Ref. to PEP410 rejection and de facto standard seems a bit expeditive. assuming it worked, this would somewhat be more agreeable ? >class timestamp(int): pass > """measure of time expressed as a number of nanoseconds""" ---------- resolution: rejected -> status: pending -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23084> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
