Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > The interesting discovery I made while reviewing the patch for issue > 22906 is that there apparently *is* implicit chaining support in > PyErr_SetObject
Indeed, there is, and it should work properly (AFAIR there was quite a bit of debugging to make this work). Also, note that normalizing is already handled. I'm not sure what you're witnessing that doesn't work as expected. I suspect that you may be confusing "an exception has been caught" (and is ready to be chained from) with "an exception has been raised" (i.e. PyErr_Occurred() is true). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23188> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com