Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is faster implementation.
$ ./python -m timeit -s "import sqlite3; con = sqlite3.connect(':memory:'); con.row_factory = sqlite3.NamedTupleRow; con.execute('create table t (a, b)')" -s "for i in range(100): con.execute('insert into t values (1, 2)')" -- "con.execute('select * from t').fetchall()" 100 loops, best of 3: 2.74 msec per loop But it is still 3 times slower than sqlite3.Row. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37673/sqlite_namedtuplerow.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13299> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com