New submission from Stephen Drake:

If a generator has its close() method called before any items are requested 
from it, a finally block in the generator function will not be executed.

I encountered this when wrapping an open file to alter the result of iterating 
over it.  Using a generator function with a try/finally block seemed like a 
simple way of acheiving this.  Here's an example that logs each line as it's 
read:

def logged_lines(f):
    try:
        for line in f:
            logging.warning(line.strip())
            yield line
    finally:
        logging.warning('closing')
        f.close()

If the generator is created and closed immediately, the underlying file-like 
object is left open:
>>> f = urlopen('https://docs.python.org/')
>>> lines = logged_lines(f)
>>> lines.close()
>>> f.closed
False

But once the first item is requested from the generator, close() will trigger 
cleanup:
>>> lines = logged_lines(f)
>>> next(lines)
WARNING:root:<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
'<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"\n'
>>> lines.close()
WARNING:root:closing
>>> f.closed
True

Having read the documentation for yield expressions, I don't believe this 
behaviour to be non-conformant - but it still seems like a bit of a gotcha to 
me.  Should this usage be warned against?

----------
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation, Interpreter Core
messages: 233903
nosy: docs@python, sjdrake
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Generator's finally block not run if close() called before first 
iteration
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23227>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to