STINNER Victor added the comment: > The (unsigned long) declaration should probably be replaced with (uint32_t)
Would it be possible to benchmark this change, to ensure that it doesn't kill performances? A quick micro-benchmark using timeit should be enough ;) I agree with the change, I already noticed the unused bits long time ago, when I took at look at the Mersenne Twister implementation. ---------- nosy: +haypo _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23488> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
