STINNER Victor added the comment: I don't understand your benchmark. Do you mean that os.walk() is slower with fast_bottom-up.patch because islink() is called or because I replaced "for entry in scandir(top):" with "entry = next(scandir_it)"?
Are you testing the top-bottom or bottom-up? Here is a variant of my patch with "for entry in scandir(top):". I would prefer to avoid this variant with a boolean to not catch OSError on the recursive call to walk() if next() has similar performances. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38471/fast_bottom-up-2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23605> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
