Demian Brecht added the comment: > I cannot imagine some existing code (other than an exploit) that would be > broken by restoring the empty “//” component; do you have an example?
You're likely right about the usage (I can't think of a plausible use case at any rate). At first read of #23505, I think I agree with the changes you've made to allow for successful round-tripping, but I'd think it'll have to be vetted by at least more than one core dev. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22852> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
