STINNER Victor added the comment:
Hum, I'm lost with the problem with C++ :-( What is your use case? Do you want
to compile CPython with C++? Or compile a third-party extension with C++ and
this extension includes "Python.h" which includes "pyatomic.h".
For third-party code, pyatomic.h is only needed by PyThreadState_GET() in
pystate.h. Maybe we should hide completly pyatomic.h. Currently, pyatomic.h is
not really used if Py_LIMITED_API is defined.
By the way, can you try to compile the extension with Py_LIMITED_API? It should
just work.
C++ 11 atomic:
---
#include <atomic>
int main()
{
std::atomic_uintptr_t current;
current.store(0, std::memory_order_relaxed);
return 0;
}
---
C++ 11 atomic used with C functions:
---
#include <atomic>
int main()
{
std::atomic<uintptr_t> current(0);
std::atomic_store_explicit(¤t, (uintptr_t)0,
std::memory_order_relaxed);
return 0;
}
---
I didn't find how to use std::atomic_store_explicit with std::atomic_uintptr_t,
so I used std::atomic<uintptr_t> instead.
"std::atomic_store_explicit(¤t, 0, std::memory_order_relaxed);" doesn't
work: 0 must be explicitly cast to uintptr_t :-(
I tried to hack pyatomic.h to use std::atomic template: see attached
pyatomic_cpp.patch.
But I don't understand: when PyThreadState_GET() is compiled in C++, should it
use exactly the same functions of CPython (compiled with C)? It should be
strange to to use a std::atomic C++ template to access an atomic C variable.
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38518/pyatomic_cpp.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23644>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com