Martin Panter added the comment:
I opened Issue 23703 about the funny doubled bar.com result. After backing out
revision 901e4e52b20a, but with my patch here applied:
>>> urljoin('mailto:foo@', 'bar.com')
'mailto:bar.com'
which seems fairly sensible to me. A more awkward question is if this behaviour
of my patch is reasonable:
>>> urljoin('mailto:person-foo/[email protected]', 'bar.com')
'mailto:person-foo/bar.com'
Yet another option, similar to my “any_scheme=True” flag, might be to change
from the “uses_relative” white-list to a “not_relative” black-list of URL
schemes, so that urljoin() works for arbitrary schemes except for ones like
“mailto:” that are in the hard-coded list.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18828>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
