R. David Murray added the comment: > If a Fortran array was allowed in a bytes-like context without memory > copying, the order of the array elements would differ from the order returned > by the meoryview.tobytes() method, which essentially is defined to copy them > out in C-array or flattend-tolist() order.
I'm still not seeing how this would cause such an object to throw an error if used in a bytes-like context. I presume by the above that you mean that the results of passing the object directly to a bytes like context differs from the results of calling .tobytes() on it and passing *that* to the bytes like context. That's not what your suggested documentation change says, though. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23756> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
