Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:

That's not a bug. The two XML documents are completely equivalent. If
you rely on the lexical representation of specific characters, you
should reconsider your usage of XML. toxml could have chosen to
represent < as &#60;, and that still would have been correct (IOW, it
doesn't even know anymore that you represented it as &lt; in the input).

----------
nosy: +loewis
resolution:  -> invalid
status: open -> closed

__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2647>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to