Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > The loop in escape should really use enumerate > instead of "for i in range(len(pattern))".
It needs i to edit s[i]. > Instead of using a loop, can't the test just > use "self.assertEqual(re.esacpe(same), same)?" Done. > Also, please add tests for what re.escape should escape. That's handled in the existing test over all bytes 0-255. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10084/re.patch __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2650> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
