Yury Selivanov added the comment:

> Hmm, but IMHO a) the new syntax isn't just for asyncio and b) awaiting a 
> Future seems like a *very* reasonable thing to do. I think opening a new 
> ticket for this is a good idea.

Stefan, I honestly have bo idea what concurrent.Future.__await__ would do.  
There is no loop for concurrent module.  If you have a patch with tests in 
mind, please open a separate issue (targeting 3.6).


Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list

Reply via email to