Yury Selivanov added the comment: > Hmm, but IMHO a) the new syntax isn't just for asyncio and b) awaiting a > Future seems like a *very* reasonable thing to do. I think opening a new > ticket for this is a good idea.
Stefan, I honestly have bo idea what concurrent.Future.__await__ would do. There is no loop for concurrent module. If you have a patch with tests in mind, please open a separate issue (targeting 3.6). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24017> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com