Paul Sokolovsky added the comment: No, I haven't brought this "many times before". Discussion on the mailing list last week was first time I brought up *this* issue. But it's indeed not the first time I provide feedback regarding various aspects of asyncio, so I wonder if this issue was closed because of "this" in "this issue" or because of "many times before"...
> If you need awrite(), it's a two-line helper function you can easily write > yourself. Yes, and I have it, but I don't see how that helps anybody else. If it's 2-liner, why don't you want to add it? Can there please be discussion of the arguments provided in the description? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24449> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
