Jason R. Coombs added the comment: @gumblex, I've applied your updated patch (though I couldn't figure out why it wouldn't apply mechanically; I had to paste it). I also corrected the test. Thanks for the advice on that.
I don't understand the second half of your message. Are you stating caveats for our edification? Do you have outstanding concerns? Can you confirm your original report is corrected by the latest tip in the patch repository? I believe what remains to be done is to add a NEWS entry and merge the changes with the 3.4, 3.5, and default branches. If a 2.7 backport is required, that could be done also. ---------- stage: needs patch -> patch review _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20387> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
