Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Thanks.
FWIW, there was one other issue. The code is set-up to accommodate aggressive in-lining so that the code in set_contains(), for example, the sets a return value of -1 gets combined with the downstream test for -1 and the pairs gets folded away in the generated code. Combining the -1 and the zero test gets in the way of this. ---------- resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24582> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
