New submission from Yury Selivanov: Should we raise something like "'int' object is not an asynchronous iterable", instead of "'async for' requires an object with __aiter__ method, got int"?
>>> foo().send(None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<stdin>", line 2, in foo TypeError: 'async for' requires an object with __aiter__ method, got int >>> for i in 1: pass ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable ---------- assignee: yselivanov components: Interpreter Core messages: 249689 nosy: gvanrossum, haypo, ncoghlan, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: better exception message when an unsupported object is passed to `async for` (pep 492) type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24995> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
