New submission from Robert Zimmerman:
For longer lists of calls, the "Expected" list is printed all on one line while
the "Actual" list is pprinted and on multiple lines. This makes it hard to do a
visual compare of which calls are missing/incorrect.
Example:
AssertionError: Calls not found.
Expected: [call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'), call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'), call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'), call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb')]
Actual: [call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa')]
What I'd expect:
AssertionError: Calls not found.
Expected: [call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'),
call('bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb')]
Actual: [call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'),
call('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa')]
----------
components: Tests
files: mock_assert_has_calls.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 252569
nosy: michael.foord, rzimmerman
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: assert_has_calls output is formatted inconsistently
type: enhancement
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40723/mock_assert_has_calls.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25347>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
