Pavel Roskin added the comment:
That's what I have now:
check:
$(PYTHON) -m py_compile $(SOURCES)
rm -f $(addsuffix c, $(SOURCES))
make check
python -m py_compile redacted-build redacted-git-diff redacted-git-gc
redacted-git-status redacted-init redacted-server
redactedbuilder.py
rm -f redacted-buildc redacted-git-diffc redacted-git-gcc redacted-git-statusc
redacted-initc redacted-serverc redactedb
uilder.pyc
That's what David is suggesting:
check:
for file in $(SOURCES); do \
python -c "compile(open('$$file').read(), '', 'exec')" || exit 1; \
done
make check
for file in redacted-build redacted-git-diff redacted-git-gc
redacted-git-status redacted-init redacted-server redactedb
uilder.py; do \
python -c "compile(open('$file').read(), '', 'exec')" || exit 1; \
done
That's what I could have if I live long enough to see Python 3.6 on my
development machine.
check:
$(PYTHON) -m py_compile --no-output $(SOURCES)
make check
python -m py_compile --no-output redacted-build redacted-git-diff
redacted-git-gc redacted-git-status redacted-init redacted-server
redactedbuilder.py
If that does not seem like an important improvement, then I can live with what
I have.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25303>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
