Erik Bray added the comment:

> I think the above code *should* break

Actually, I see now that Serhiy's patch would allow this example to just pass 
through to the non-interactive fallback.  So I take it back that my example 
should break--I think using the fallback would also be fine.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8256>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to