Mark Lundeberg added the comment: Good point, it is doing (int-complex), observe also the following pecularities:
>>> -0 - 0j 0j >>> -0. - 0j (-0+0j) >>> -0j -0j >>> 0-0j 0j >>> -(0j) (-0-0j) >>> 0.+(-0j) 0j Does this mean the bug is in repr() ? As I understand the output of repr() is supposed to be something that can evaluated to recreate the same object. However I am unsure whether it would be nicer if repr() were to yield 'complex(-0.,-0.)' or '-(-0.+0j)'. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25839> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
