Bernhard M. Wiedemann added the comment: should probably be
lines = [x[n*64:(n+1)*64] for n in range(((len(x)-1)//64)+1)] to avoid an empty line added when the last line is full which once again shows why people prefer to use standard libraries for this kind of work ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25870> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
