Guido van Rossum added the comment: PEP 492 is provisional, we can change things like this in 3.5.2.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Martin Panter <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Martin Panter added the comment: > > It should always be valid to create a new coroutine instance. Perhaps you > meant: > > instance = foo() > print(await instance) # Okay the first time > print(await instance) # Second time should be an error > > This seems sensible, at least for 3.6. Maybe it should also be an error to > re-await if the coroutine raised an exception, and if it was cancelled via > close(). > > ---------- > nosy: +martin.panter > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue25887> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25887> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
