Ramchandra Apte added the comment:
It is good to add warnings; if they are ignored it is little worse than the
status quo.
On 1 January 2016 at 08:54, Ezio Melotti <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Ezio Melotti added the comment:
>
> > People are going to skip warning boxes if they occur too often.
>
> I'm not sure I agree. This would be true if they were abused for trivial
> things ("Warnings: using .pop() on a empty list will return an
> IndexError!"), but I don't think they are.
>
> I think warnings are ignored only by people that are already familiar with
> the module and its limitation/issues, and that know what they are doing.
> If the warning is not evident, people are going to miss it [0].
>
> If warnings are used correctly, people will spot them easily and read them
> (or ignore them if they already know what they are warning against).
>
> [0]: I know I missed it in e.g. https://api.jquery.com/die/ -- the
> function is deprecated, but (currently) this is only written in the top
> right corner and in small in the category at the top -- two places that are
> easily overlooked. https://api.jquery.com/toggle-event/ on the other
> hand has a clearly visible yellow box at the top that immediately says that
> the method is deprecated.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17006>
> _______________________________________
>
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17006>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
