STINNER Victor added the comment: >> It looks like some benchmarks are up to 4% faster:
> What this says is that some internals uses of PyMem_XXX should be replaced > with PyObject_XXX. Why not changing PyMem_XXX to use the same fast allocator than PyObject_XXX? (as proposed in this issue) FYI we now also have the PyMem_RawXXX family :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26249> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
