Mathieu Dupuy added the comment: discarding the microseconds digits after the 6th.
2016-02-15 13:30 GMT+10:30 karl <rep...@bugs.python.org>: > > karl added the comment: > > About > > > Actually, I realized that the best implementation of parsing rfc 3339 > > is in django dateparse utils. To me it's the finest, the most > > elegant, and no other one can claim to be more robust since it's > > probably the #1 iso parsing functions used in python. Have a look at > > > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.9/_modules/django/utils/dateparse/#parse_datetime > > How does it parse this date: > > 2016-02-15T11:59:46.16588638674+09:00 > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue15873> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15873> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
