Martin Panter added the comment:
I tend to agree with the comment at
<https://bugs.python.org/issue2936#msg67505>. Find_library() is documented as
emulating a build-time linker, not run-time. Build-time linking ignores
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Maybe it would make more sense to pass in an optional list of -L directories to
search, but it really depends on what the use cases are.
Pau: What is wrong with the more direct CDLL("libspatialindex_c.so") proposal
that bypasses find_library()?
----------
nosy: +martin.panter
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9998>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
