Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
PEP 3134's implicit exception chaining (if accepted) would require your
semantic, and your semantic is simpler anyway (even if the
implementation is non-trivial), so consider my objections to be dropped.
PEP 3134 also proposes implicit chaining during a finally block, which
raises questions for this case:
try:
...
finally:
print(sys.exc_info())
raise
If sys.exc_info() were removed (with no direct replacement) we'd have
that behaviour answered. raise could be answered by making it a syntax
error, but keep in mind this may be nested in another except block:
try:
...
except:
try:
...
finally:
raise
I'd prefer a syntax error in this case as well, to avoid any ambiguity
and to keep the implementation simple.
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3021>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
