Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: References:
Issue23910 -- added original optimization (661cdbd617b8). Issue24276 -- it was significant rewritten (5dbf3d932a59). My suggestion in msg263886 to revert the optimization was related to the original code. Now, after reminding the background, I think it is worth to keep the optimization and try to fix the code. Making the cached tuple to save None adds additional complexity and overhead (about 5%). Here is a patch that uses different trick. The size of saved tuple is set to 0. ---------- stage: -> patch review type: -> crash Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42547/property_cached_args_set_size_0.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26811> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
