Nathan Naze added the comment: > It does 'bool(value)', and 'bool("False")' is True, since "False" is a > non-empty string.
Yes, I understand this. It's fine to mark as "working as intended", but coming from other flag-parsing libraries, I find the behavior unintuitive and do not understand the utility of accepting arbitrary strings given the potential for user confusion. We uncovered this behavior debugging a script used internally at Google. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26994> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com