New submission from Nick Coghlan: The new subprocess.run() API is a swiss-army-knife API like subprocess.Popen before it.
1. You have to pass a boolean toggle to indicate whether or not you want the return code checked 2. You have to pass magic constants to keyword arguments to indicate whether or not you want output captured 3. You have to understand and deconstruct a complex object in order to get useful information from it By contrast, the *actual* high-level API encodes all those requests in the name of the function you call. (This isn't a request to change anything functional, it's a request to undo the harm done to the subprocess documentation by backing away from the claim that this is a high level API on par with call, check_call and check_output - it's not, it's just not quite as low level as subprocess.Popen) ---------- messages: 265806 nosy: ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Demote run() below the high level APIs in subprocess docs _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27050> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
