Raymond Hettinger added the comment: The docs are already pretty clear. In general, there isn't a defense against a naive use of anything in the computing world. We can write docs but can't make a person read them and realize that their pre-existing mental model is off base.
Sorry, but I'm going to close this. The module is doing what it was designed for and what it want documented to do. It has mostly had a successful history and I don't see anything worth churning the API. I think you will just have to chalk this up to experience :-) ---------- resolution: -> not a bug status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27396> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
