Yury Selivanov added the comment: > wrap_socket implies that it's for wrapping client or server sockets, but it's > not. It's only for handling server sockets. Also, I prefer a name that > reflects goal, not mechanism.
> I think the name should be discussed over here: > https://bugs.python.org/issue27392. Why can't `wrap_socket` be used for wrapping client sockets? I think we can refactor asyncio to use it in 'create_connection', and maybe to accept new connections. To my ear, 'asyncio.handle_connection' implies that asyncio will "handle" the connection, i.e. that asyncio itself would do more than just wrapping the socket and attaching a protocol instance. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27392> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
