New submission from July Tikhonov:
A note just below object.__setstate__() documentation
https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/pickle.html#object.__setstate__
says that
"""
… the type should implement __getnewargs__() or __getnewargs_ex__() to
establish such an invariant; otherwise, neither __new__() nor __init__() will
be called.
"""
I believe that note about not calling __new__() was relevant in python2. I
could not find case in python3 in which __new__() would not be called. And
__init__() is not called anyway, as far as I understand (unless explicitly by
__setstate__() or something).
Python 3.6.0a3+ (default:da9898e7e90d, Jul 27 2016, 19:51:12)
[GCC 4.9.3] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> class C:
... def __getstate__(self): return {'foo' : self.foo}
... def __setstate__(self, state): self.foo = state['foo']
... def __new__(cls):
... print('__new__ is called'); return super().__new__(cls)
... def __init__(self):
... print('__init__ is called'); self.foo = None; super().__init__()
...
>>> c = C(); c.foo = 'bar'
__new__ is called
__init__ is called
>>> import pickle
>>> c2 = pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(c))
__new__ is called
>>> c2.foo
'bar'
----------
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 271465
nosy: docs@python, july
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: pickle documentation says that unpickling may not call __new__
versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27635>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
