Guido van Rossum added the comment: Does this repro with the latest Python 3.5.2? IIRC the lock code was overhauled after 3.5.0 or 3.5.1.
(PS. These are tasks, not threads.) --Guido (mobile) On Aug 4, 2016 2:33 AM, "sss" <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: sss added the comment: Yes, await asyncio.sleep(0) does fix it, but it would be weird if I'm supposed to put those all over my code. I made a new reproducer now that uses 2 threads in case it's not allowed to take the same lock twice from the same thread. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file44007/lock2.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27585> _______________________________________ ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27585> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
