Eryk Sun added the comment: Victor, it seems the only option here (other than closing this as won't fix) is to modify the UTF-16 decoder in 2.7 to allow lone surrogates, which would be consistent with the UTF-8 and UTF-32 decoders. While it's too late to enforce strict compliance in 2.7, it shouldn't hurt to expand the domain of acceptable encodings. Then if surrogates are always passed in 2.7, a silently ignored "surrogatepass" handler could be added for compatibility with 3.x code.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27971> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
