Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
> Looking again at the comments for the other respondents, I think this
> should just be closed. It doesn't make sense to disturb a long
> standing API or the break the join/split symmetry.
For what it's worth, in hindsight I agree. I'm a little embarassed that
I missed such a simple solution. Sorry for the noise!
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list